Climeworks factory in Zurich, Switzerland |
A
Swiss company on May 31 is set to become the world's first to commercially
remove carbon dioxide directly from the atmosphere and turn it into a useful
product.
Climeworks
, which will begin operations at a facility near Zurich, Switzerland, plans to
compress the CO2 it captures and use it as fertilizer to grow crops in
greenhouses. The company wants to dramatically scale its technology over the
next decade, and its long-term goal is to capture 1% of global annual carbon
dioxide emissions by 2025.
Along
with cutting fossil fuel use to zero, removing carbon dioxide from the air is
increasingly seen as one way to stop the long-term buildup of greenhouse gases
in the atmosphere. Carbon removal and storage coupled with drawing down fossil
fuel use is called "negative emissions."
Time
is running out to perfect the various methods of capturing carbon dioxide and
permanently storing it. Research shows that atmospheric carbon dioxide
concentrations will increase to the point that 2 degrees C (3.6 degrees F) of
global warming will be inevitable within the next 22 years. Scientists consider
that level of global warming dangerous, and the goal of the Paris climate
agreement is to stop global warming before that limit is reached.
The
technology to remove carbon dioxide from the atmosphere, including planting new
forests and building facilities that directly remove and capture climate
pollution from the air, is in its infancy. It has never been tried at a large
scale, and nobody knows if it can be used worldwide to remove enough carbon
dioxide to slow warming.
The
Climeworks plant represents the beginning of an industry that is attempting to
perfect the technology. Other companies, such as British Columbia-based
Carbon
Engineering, are also working on direct-air capture plants that will
commercially suck carbon dioxide from the air.
Sabine
Fuss, a sustainable energy researcher at the Mercator Research Institute on
Global Commons and Climate Change in Berlin who is unaffiliated with
Climeworks, said that the company's direct-air capture plant is the first of
its kind to operate on an industrial scale.
"It's
important to note that they will not be permanently storing the CO2 that will
be captured," she said. "Instead, it will be used for greenhouses,
producing synfuels, etc. No negative emissions will be generated."
Negative
emissions can only occur when the captured carbon dioxide is removed from the
atmosphere and then locked away forever, she said.
But
Climeworks cofounder Christoph Gebald said the company's carbon capture plant
can be used for carbon sequestration.
"Highly
scalable negative emission technologies are crucial if we are to stay below the
2 degrees C target of the international community," he said. "The DAC
(direct-air capture) technology provides distinct advantages to achieve this
aim and is perfectly suitable to be combined with underground storage."
Gebald
said his team installed 18 carbon dioxide collectors on the roof of a garbage
incineration plant outside Zurich. Powered by wasted heat from the incinerator,
the collectors use fans to suck ambient air into filters, which absorb carbon
dioxide. The filters are heated and the carbon dioxide is removed and piped
into nearby greenhouses, which will use 900 metric tons of captured carbon to
grow crops each year.
The
captured carbon dioxide could also be used to manufacture transportation fuel,
carbonated soft drinks, and other products, Gebald said.
In
order to meet the goal of removing the equivalent of 1% of annual global carbon
dioxide emissions, 250,000 similar direct-air capture plants would have to be
built, Gebald said.
Future
direct-air capture plants will cost up to $400 per metric ton of captured
carbon dioxide to operate, Gebald said, with carbon sequestration adding an
additional $10-$20 to that cost per ton.
Glen
Peters , a researcher at CICERO , a climate research organization in Norway,
said he is not closely familiar with Climeworks, but said it will be impressive
if the company can meet its goal to capture 1% of global carbon emissions, but
only if it can be stored. He said operational costs need to fall to about $100
per ton of captured carbon for the technology to be scalable.
Some
carbon removal technology is controversial because some methods involve
planting new forests and forcing large-scale changes in the way land is used,
possibly displacing people and the farms they rely on to grow their food.
Peters
coauthored a paper published last year warning that staking the future only on
negative emissions technologies presents a "moral hazard" because
they're unproven, there is a substantial risk that the technology can't be
scaled up, and it may allow policymakers to think that weaning humanity away
from fossil fuels is not urgent.
When
asked if Climeworks is participating in a morally hazardous climate strategy,
Gebald said that scientists are certain that global warming can only be
addressed if global carbon dioxide emissions drop to zero.
"We
feel there is no moral hazard," he said. "The only way we can achieve
this is by using all means we have available."
Both
getting rid of fossil fuels and directly capturing carbon dioxide from the air
are necessary to solve climate change, Gebald said.
Source: BusinessInsider
No comments:
Post a Comment
Please share your view about the article in the Comment section.